MEDICAL TESTS – What You Should Know
What your health care practitioner must tell you about medical tests
Your health
care practitioner has an obligation to tell you everything about each test, both good and bad, before you undergo it. That
means you can ask about how reliable and accurate the test is, any harm or negative effects of the test such as pain or additional
conditions that could occur as a result of the test, what he hopes to accomplish by having you take the test. Also ask: “What
will you do if the test is abnormal?” and “What will you do if the test is normal?” If you get the same
answer to both questions, then ask, “Then why do the test?”
What can affect the outcome of medical tests?
Because certain
foods, medicines, and/or vitamins can have a negative effect on the test. Your health care practitioner should ask you about
each of these prior to telling you to have a test. This is not always done and the results can be disastrous. Always ask if
what you’re eating or taking can affect the results of a test if your health care practitioner doesn’t bring it
up.
How reliable are medical tests?
Be aware that
tests vary in reliability. Some tests have very low reliability. That means you can’t rely on the results. You can never
be sure that any single medical test, or even a single battery of medical tests, is reliable. Reliable means you get consistent
results over time or over tests or over people doing the tests. No test is 100% reliable, so you can get a false positive
(showing you have something when you don’t) or a false negative (showing you don’t have something that you do).
What’s more reliable than medical tests?
Because of
this reliability problem, never regard a test as anything more than a means of confirming what can be observed clinically:
your symptoms, the physical signs you exhibit, your family’s medical history and your health care practitioner’s
impressions.
What if your medical tests don’t jibe with your symptoms?
Avoid undergoing
therapy or treatments if the tests don’t support clinical information, such as your symptoms, how you feel, etc. Never
change your entire lifestyle based on the results of one test. Make sure you have the test repeated at least twice, and in
different settings (another laboratory or another practitioner’s office that isn’t affiliated with your practitioner.
How reliable are medical laboratories?
When medical
laboratories were tested for accuracy, more than 1 out of every 7 tests results were found to be either in error
or totally unreliable. That means millions of tests performed every day are inaccurate. Many of these inaccuracies occur because
the testing chemicals are defective because they’re out of date, contaminated or mislabeled, according to the Food and
Drug Administration.
A study performed
by the Centers for Disease Control found that only 5% of one test were accurate; 95% were inaccurate and gave the wrong diagnosis
to the people having the test.
A biochemist
at Sloan
Kettering Hospital sent slides
to laboratories around the country. Fifty percent of the labs made a wrong diagnosis; that means every other person got the
wrong diagnosis.
How valid are medical tests?
Even when a
test is preformed correctly, the results may not be valid. Every test can be evaluated based on its sensitivity (the ability
to detect a disease). No tests are 100% sensitive. But even tests with 80% sensitivity mean 20% of people having the tests
will get the wrong results. For example, the stress electrocardiogram fails to show potential abnormalities or identifying
existing heart disease in more than half of all tests! This is worse than a guess, which is theoretically correct 50% of the
time.
The second
criterion for evaluating lab tests is specificity. This percentage tells the test’s ability to show a negative or normal
result when the condition does not exist in the person being tested. A test with an 80% specificity rating will give a false
positive negative result 20% of the time; this means 20 out of every 100 people having the test will get a false positive
results.
There are other
statistical ways to look at tests. It’s most important to remember that no test is 100% accurate, so don’t have
surgery or take an experimental drug or one with many nasty side effects based on one test.
How reliable are blood pressure, electrocardiograph and X-ray machines?
One study found
that 1 out of every 2 blood pressure apparatuses gives the wrong reading, usually on the high side. Similar studies found that thousands of electrocardiograph machines are improperly calibrated. The other
problem with electrocardiograms is that they and fail to detect heart problems in a great many patients (poor sensitivity)
and falsely indicates heart problems in many other people (poor specificity), so it has a very low predictive ability and
low accuracy. X-ray machines are often operated by improperly trained technicians that produce faulty or ineffective pictures.
What are the dangers of medical tests?
No medical
test is without risk, be it some devastating side effect, such as an allergic reaction, an infection, or excruciating anxiety
wondering how long you have to live based on a false-test death sentence.
Many tests have insignificant
results and may not point to specific diseases. This can cause a great deal of anxiety and even physical reactions if test
results are accepts at face value. The more tests you have, the more potential for negative results. More importantly, treatment,
even surgery, may be instituted for a condition that does not exist. This is the ultimate danger of medical testing.
Why are so many medical tests performed in the United States?
So many tests
are performed in the U.S. because we operate
on a fee-for-service system. When compared to British physicians, U.S.
doctors order 40 times more tests than their London colleagues.
This is because U.S.
doctors are paid for each and every test they order, doctors where national health insurance exists, are not.
Because physicians
and medical centers buy expensive equipment for stress tests, X-rays, CAT scans, MRIs, etc., they must perform many tests
to pay for that equipment, whether the test is valid or not.
Medical tests
are the largest single health cost item and account for the largest portion of a hospital bill. Medical tests provide the
greatest source of income for hospitals, which is why many of them demand that every patient undergo a battery of tests upon
admission, even though they may have been performed the day before in a doctor’s office or a laboratory. Medical tests
are also a great source of income for physicians.
Younger physicians
are more apt to prescribe medical tests, substituting the results for the observations of experience. It used to be that doctors
questioned and examined their patient far more carefully and applied testing only to confirm their suspicions. Today, the
tests come first and results, not your complaints guide therapy.
Up to 80% of
physicians in the U.S. practice defensive
medicine, ordering unnecessary tests to protect themselves from possible law suits.
What is the effect of unnecessary medical tests?
One study showed
that only 5 percent of all lab tests actually results in altered patient care or had any impact on a patient’s diagnosis
or treatment. Several studies revealed that a great many doctors never even look at the reported results of medical tests
after they have been recorded on the patient’s hospital chart.
A major effect
of unnecessary medical tests is the increased cost of medical care by hundreds of billions of dollars a year. If you have
health insurance, you probably think it’s not costing you anything, so why not have the test? The answer is employer’s payments for workers’ health care are reflected in the cost of merchandise.
So, in reality, you are paying for the tests, even though they seem to be free.
What is iatrogenic disease?
Iatrogenic
disease means the cause of the disease or suffering came directly from the health care practitioner’s actions or words,
not from any germ, improper living, or genetic defect. The actions could be unnecessary surgery, ordering the wrong drug or
the wrong dosage of the drug, or giving improper counsel.
For every 7
medical tests you have, you will receive at least one false-positive result, indicating the presence of a condition or disease
when none exists.
Invasive vs. noninvasive medical tests
Invasive tests
penetrate the skin or body orifices (openings). It’s always more risky to have an invasive medical test. If your health
care practitioner orders one, ask if you can have a noninvasive test instead.
An invasive
test itself is sufficient to produce a false-abnormal test result where no abnormality exists. This is strong evidence for
choosing noninvasive tests.
Should you have medical tests offered at health fairs?
Bear in mind
that in one study, 2 out of every 5 tests (blood pressure, blood sugar, etc.) had at least one false-abnormal test result
at health fairs. If you test positive, you can waste a lot of money trying to refute or validate that result with your physician
or health care practitioner.
Also remember
that when you volunteer to take a medical test at a health fair, whoever administers the tests is under no obligation to warn
you of related risks associated with the test(s).
What should you do if your health care practitioner suggests you have surgery
or take medicine based on a medical test result?
Don’t
worry about the results of one test, especially if it doesn’t agree with your symptoms. Just have the test performed
by another practitioner in another office and compare the two. If necessary, have a third opinion. Most health insurance programs
will pay for at least one second opinion; some pay for two.
What are your legal rights regarding medical testing?
Under the law, a mistake in medical testing
is negligence on the part of the testing facility or health care practitioner.
When you undergo
a test, you the right to know it was conducted with absolute accuracy, what the test is supposed to detect, how well it should
perform, any dangers, and what the results mean to you.
When you health
care practitioner orders a test, that amounts to implied warranty that the people and machines or chemicals used are correct.
Any error, no matter how slight, is not to be tolerated. You should be compensated for any error monetarily.
What if you
were told you had high blood sugar and it turned out the lab technician left the tourniquet on your arm too long (causing
erroneously high blood chemistry results), or what if the lab tech left your blood sample standing around too long and your
blood-sugar level was report as low? Either result can cause extreme emotional and/or physical results in you.
Remember: a
clinical lab should repeat any test without charge if you feel the test does not reflect your symptoms or your health care
practitioner’s suspicions.
Sources/Resources:
Cathy Pinckney and Edward R. Pinckney, M.D. The
Patient’s Guide to Medical Tests.
Barry L. Zaret, Peter I. Jetlow, and Lee D. Katz.
Yale University School of Medicine: Patient’s
Guide to Medical Tests.
Hemingway, H, Chen R, Junghans C, Timmis A,
Eldridge
S, Black N, Shekelle P, Feder G.
Appropriateness
criteria for coronary angiography
in angina: reliability and validity. Annals of
Internal Medicine. 2008 Aug 19;149(4):221-31.
Jones RC, Dickson-Spillmann M, Mather MJ,
Marks D, Shackell BS. Accuracy of diagnostic
registers and management of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease:
the Devon primary care audit.
Respiratory Research. 2008 Aug 18;9:62.
Riegert-Johnson DL, Macaya D, Hefferon TW,
Boardman LA. Medical
errors related to
inappropriate genetic testing in liver
transplant
patients.Genetic Testing. 2007 Winter;11(4):451-
3.
Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Kegler SR, Richards
CL.Medication use leading to emergency
department visits for adverse drug events in older
adults. Annals of
Internal Medicine.
2007 Dec 4;147(11):755-65. Summary
for
patients : Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 4;147
(11):I24.
Picano E, Lombardi M, Neglia D, Lazzeri M.
Sustainability of medical imaging in
cardiology Recent Progress in Medicine. 2006
Nov;97(11):652-62.
Boone DJ. How can we make laboratory testing
safer? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory
Medicine.
2007;45(6):708-11.
Bowman SM, Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Sharar
SR. The role of hospital profit status in pediatric
spleen injury management.
Medical Care. 2008
Mar;46(3):331-8.
Barrett B, Stiles M. What a fair and rational
health
system would look like. Western
Medical Journal.
2007 Feb;106(1):9-11.